System for spatial recombination of ultrashort laser pulses by means of a diffractive element

ABSTRACT

A system based on recombination by superposition using a diffractive optical element DOE to combine the beams is provided. An optical diffractive assembly is placed upstream of a diffractive optical element to make it possible, via an appropriate imaging system, to optimize the combining efficiency in the ultra-short pulse regime.

The field of the invention is that of the coherent recombining of a large number of ultra-short pulse laser sources, that is to say with pulse width of less than a picosecond. The framework of the invention relates to the technique of the spatial recombining of these laser pulses, assumed to be perfectly synchronized otherwise.

Coherent recombination of ultra-short pulse laser sources applies notably to the realization of high-energy laser sources.

Methods for spatially recombining coherent beams fall into 2 categories, depending on whether one chooses to juxtapose the optical beams in the far field or to superpose them in the near field, that is to say at the level of the exit pupil of the system.

A system for recombining by juxtaposition is shown in FIG. 1a . In this case, the beams to be recombined, arising from laser sources F_(k), k varying from 0 to N, are parallel and collimated in the near field by an array of collimating lenses MLC, and are disposed alongside one another, in the most compact manner possible. The superposition of the beams is then performed by free propagation up to the far field. Such a system does not involve any dispersive hardware components and therefore applies equally for pulse widths of less than a picosecond. However, the major drawback of this system is its relatively low efficiency, with notably an appreciable share of the energy lost in the grating lobes.

In the case of a near-field superposition system, it is for example possible to recombine the optical beams by using the polarization of the electromagnetic field: the optical beams arising from the laser sources F_(k) and collimated by collimating lenses CL_(k) are superposed in the near field by means of polarization-splitter cubes PBS_(k) respectively associated with half-wave plates HWP_(k), as illustrated by the example of FIG. 1b . According to this system the recombining efficiency for N beams is given by:

${Eff} = {\frac{1}{N}\left( {\eta^{N - 1} + {\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{N - 1}\; \eta^{k}}} \right)}$

where η is the coefficient of transmission of each pair (polarization-splitter cube/half-wave plate). The advantage of this architecture is its relative simplicity of implementation for a reduced number of beams to be recombined: typically about ten at the maximum. For a large number of beams, on the one hand the implementation of the system becomes very complex, and on the other hand, the recombining efficiency drops rapidly with the number of sources (for η=99%, the efficiency drops to 10% for 1000 recombined beams).

Whether involving recombination in the far field by free propagation of collimated and parallel beams, or superposition of the near-field beams by using a splitter plate or a polarization-splitter cube, none of these systems is suitable for recombining a large number of pulses (typically >100 or indeed 1000), i.e. due to problems of efficiency (grating lobes for the far-field device), or of implementation for near-field systems.

Another technique for recombining by superposition uses a diffractive optical element to combine the beams. According to this technique illustrated in FIG. 1c , a lens 23 in a Fourier-transform setup makes it possible to collimate the beams to be recombined (arising from the laser sources F_(k)) and to direct them toward a diffractive optical element or DOE 1 situated in the focal plane of the lens 23. The spatial distribution of the source points in the object plane A of the lens 23 (periodic distribution of period P_(A)) is transformed into a distribution of angles of incidence on the optical element DOE 1. The optical element 1 is typically a periodic phase grating, for example of Damann grating type, which ensures the constructive interference of all the incident beams on the order 0, and destructive on all the other orders; the period A of this grating and the angles of incidence θ_(2k) are related by the known formula for diffraction gratings:

${\sin \left( \theta_{2\; k} \right)} = {k \times \frac{\lambda_{0}}{\Lambda}}$

The advantages of this architecture are notably a high efficiency (beyond 90% demonstrated in the continuous regime), and an architecture that is well suited to a very large number of beams (typically >100) on account of this collective positioning, of a possible two-dimensional arrangement, and of the use of a single lens. On the other hand, this technique may not apply as is in the ultra-short pulse regime.

The technical problem to be solved consists in transferring as efficiently as possible the energy of each of the laser pulses to a single pulse by a coherent process, while degrading the beam quality of the final pulse as little as possible with respect to the elementary pulses, while being compatible with a large number of summed pulses, and also sub-picosecond pulse duration.

The proposed solution is based on recombination by superposition using a diffractive optical element DOE to combine the beams. According to the invention, an optical diffractive assembly is placed upstream of this diffractive optical element so as to make it possible, via an appropriate imaging system, to optimize the combining efficiency in the ultra-short pulse regime.

More precisely the subject of the invention is a system for the spatial recombining of pulse laser beams of the same wavelength centered around λ₀, arising from N synchronized sources k, k varying from 1 to N, N being an integer >1, which has an optical axis and comprises:

a Fourier lens of focal length f₂, of predefined object plane and predefined image plane, the laser beams exhibiting at λ₀ a periodic spatial configuration of spacing P_(A), in the object plane (plane A),

a recombining diffractive optical element with periodic phase profile, on which the N beams are intended to be directed by the Fourier lens according to an angle of incidence θ_(2k) that differs from one beam to the next, these angles of incidence being determined as a function of the period of the recombining diffractive optical element.

It is mainly characterized in that the sources are able to emit pulses of duration of less than 10⁻¹² s, and in that it comprises:

N compensating diffractive optical elements (DOEs) with periodic grating with one compensating diffractive optical element per source, an angle of incidence θ_(1k) that differs from one beam to the next, and a grating spacing Λ_(1k) that differs between neighboring compensating diffractive optical elements,

an array of lenses with one lens per source, of predefined object plane and predefined image plane, forming with the Fourier lens a double-FT setup of predetermined magnification γ, able to image each compensating diffractive optical element on the recombining diffractive optical element, the compensating DOE being situated in the object plane of the array of lenses, the recombining DOE being situated in the image plane of the Fourier lens, the image plane of the array of lenses coinciding with the object plane of the Fourier lens,

and in that for each compensating DOE, the angle of incidence θ_(1k) of the beam on the compensating DOE, the angle of inclination Θ_(k) of the compensating DOE on the optical axis, and the spacing Λ_(1k) of its grating, are determined on the basis of the spacing P_(A), of k, of λ₀, of the magnification γ, of the focal length f₂ and of the period of the recombining diffractive optical element.

According to one embodiment of the invention, the angles of inclination Θ_(k) of the compensating DOEs are zero, the DOEs being situated in one and the same plane.

The sources can be disposed according to a one-dimensional or two-dimensional spatial configuration.

Preferably, the compensating DOE gratings are blazed gratings.

According to a characteristic of the invention, the beams arising from the laser sources have one and the same exit plane, and the system comprises another Fourier lens having an object plane in which the exit plane of the laser sources and an image plane of the laser sources is situated. The position of the image plane of this lens with respect to the plane in which the assembly of the compensating diffractive optical elements is situated, as well as the separation of the sources in the object plane of the lens, are determined as a function of the focal length of the Fourier lens, of the period P_(A), and of the angles θ_(1k).

Other characteristics and advantages of the invention will become apparent on reading the detailed description which follows, given by way of nonlimiting example and with reference to the appended drawings in which:

FIG. 1 already described schematically represent systems for the spatial recombining of coherent beams in the near field (FIG. 1a ), in the far field (FIG. 1b ) and by a diffractive element (FIG. 1c ),

FIG. 2 schematically illustrate the problems posed by a system for the spatial recombining of coherent beams by a diffractive element: the chromatic dispersion (FIG. 2a ), the defect of spatial overlap (FIG. 2b ), as well as an exemplary curve of the overlap coefficient as a function of the size of the pupil (FIG. 2c ),

FIG. 3 schematically illustrates the conditions fulfilled by a system for the spatial recombining of coherent beams by a diffractive element according to the invention,

FIG. 4 schematically represents an exemplary system for the spatial recombining of coherent beams by a diffractive element according to the invention,

FIG. 5 schematically represent for a single source, the principle (FIG. 5a ) of chromatic dispersion compensation and of optimization of the spatial overlap by a system for the spatial recombining of beams according to the invention, a more detailed view at the level of a compensating DOE illustrating the inclination of the spatial distribution of the pulse on passing through a compensating DOE (FIG. 5b ), and the corresponding geometric construction illustrating the geometric construction of the grating vector {right arrow over (K)}_(k,1) of the compensating DOE as a function of the angles of incidence and of inclination of the grating, and of the incident wave vector {right arrow over (K)}_(i,1) (FIG. 5c ),

FIG. 6 schematically illustrate the graphical determination of the angles of diffraction on a compensating DOE (FIG. 6a ) and on the combining DOE (FIG. 6b ) for two different wavelengths,

FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary calculation of the angles of incidence and of inclination of the compensation gratings for optimization of the overlap of the pulses on the combining DOE and compensation of the chromatic dispersion,

FIG. 8 show two exemplary embodiments of a system for the spatial recombining of beams according to the invention, with compensating DOEs disposed in one and the same plane when the chromatic compensation (FIG. 8b ) or the compensation of the overlap defect (FIG. 8a ) is favored.

From one figure to the next, the same elements are tagged by the same references.

The description is given with reference to the orientation of the figures described. Insofar as the system can be positioned according to other orientations, the directional terminology is indicated by way of illustration and is not limiting.

When the system is aimed at recombining pulse laser sources, with a pulse width of typically less than 1 picosecond, two difficulties occur in setting up the recombining system with a DOE such as described in FIG. 2:

-   -   The first difficulty is related to the spectral width of the         pulses (typically of the order of Δλ=10 nm for Δt˜100.10⁻¹⁵ s).         The diffractive element 1 is specified and produced for a given         operating wavelength. However, a spectral width of the order of         10 nm does not substantially affect the efficiency of         recombination of the DOE (typically an efficiency loss of a few         % for a spectral width of 10 nm). The angular dispersion δθ₀ of         the DOE is on the other hand more problematic (the blue         component of the spectrum of the pulse will exit the DOE with a         different angle from the red component, as illustrated in FIG.         2a ).     -   This effect is on the one hand detrimental to the spatial         quality of the recombined beam by increasing its divergence and         on the other hand degrades the spatial dispersion of the beam         and temporally widens the pulse.     -   The second difficulty is related to the spatial overlap of short         pulses having different angles of incidence on the DOE. This         effect is illustrated in FIG. 2b and is related to the limited         spatial extent of the pulses: limited to 2ω (at 1/e²)         transversely to the direction of propagation of the light, and         limited to c.Δt in the direction of propagation of the light (c         the speed of light, and Δt the duration of the pulse). There is         perfect overlap of the pulses for a zero angle between the         directions of propagation, and an overlap which decreases as         this angle increases. In the application illustrated in FIG. 1c         for a numerical aperture equal to 1, the angle between the         directions of propagation depends on the focal length of the         Fourier lens 23 used, which is equal at the minimum to the size         of the total pupil in the plane A i.e. the product of the number         of channels (one-dimensional, or according to a diameter of the         pattern of disposition of the laser sources) multiplied by the         spacing between 2 consecutive sources in the plane A. FIG. 2c         gives the coefficient of overlap between the pulses (of duration         300 10⁻¹⁵ s) calculated as a function of the size of the pupil         in the plane A for the best value of focal length of the Fourier         lens. This calculation clearly illustrate the impossibility of         efficiently using the architecture such as shown in FIG. 1c in         the short-pulse regime (<10⁻¹² s) for a number of channels of         typically greater than 10 (on one dimension).

Finally, a recombining system using an optical diffractive element DOE, which ensures the constructive interference of all the pulses along a single direction of propagation, and destructive along all others, could be an excellent candidate for recombining a large number of pulses, but it suffers from two major problems in the ultra-short pulse regime:

the problem related to the spectral width of the pulses, and

the defect of spatial overlap of the pulses at the level of the DOE, on account of the distribution of the angles of incidence of the beams.

The system according to the invention comprises a compensating configuration, the technical effect of which is to realize the conditions illustrated in FIG. 3, that is to say:

on the one hand, the red and blue components of the spectrum of the pulse must arrive with different angles of incidence on the combining DOE 1, calculated in such a way that the wave vectors on exiting this combining DOE are all along the z axis of the figure, whatever the wavelength;

on the other hand, whatever the angle of incidence of the pulse on the combining DOE, the spatial distribution of energy at a set instant must be parallel to the combining DOE 1, i.e. parallel to the yOx plane of the figure, this being so as to optimize the spatial overlap of the pulses on the combining DOE.

This compensating configuration 2 is described in conjunction with FIGS. 4 and 5 a, 5 b and 5 c.

A first diffractive compensating assembly 21 is imaged on the combining DOE 1 by an imaging device. This imaging device comprises:

an array 22 of M lenses (one lens per beam) of focal lengths f₁ spaced apart by the spacing P_(A), P_(A) being the spatial period of the beams at λ₀ in the plane A, and

the Fourier lens 23 of focal length f₂, and of aperture at least equal to N×f₁, N being the number of laser sources (along the dimension represented in FIG. 5a ).

This array 22 of lenses forms with the Fourier lens 23 a double-FT setup of predetermined magnification γ, able to image the diffractive optical compensating assembly 21 on the recombining diffractive optical element 1: the diffractive optical compensating assembly 21 is situated in the object plane of the array of lenses 22, the recombining DOE 1 being situated in the image plane of the Fourier lens 23, the image plane of the array of lenses 22 coinciding with the object plane of the Fourier lens 23.

This diffractive compensating assembly 21 is subdivided into N compensating DOEs also spaced apart by P_(A), each compensating DOE 211 comprising a periodic phase and/or amplitude grating of spacing Λ_(1k). The optical beams arising from the pulse laser sources S_(k) are collimated upstream of the system (they are for example situated in a plane and collimated by a lens, or positioned directly according to their angle of incidence θ_(1k) with a collimating lens associated with each source), and each beam arrives with a specific angle θ_(1k) on the corresponding compensating DOE 211. Each spacing Λ_(1k) is calculated as a function of the angle of incidence θ_(1k) of the beam on the corresponding compensating DOE and of the angle of inclination Θ_(k) of the compensating DOE on the z axis (we have Λ_(1(k−1))≠Λ_(1k)≠Λ_(1(k+1)), but Λ_(1(−k))=Λ_(1(+k))), so that at the central wavelength λ₀, all the laser beams are parallel on exiting the compensating DOEs, that is to say that at the central wavelength λ₀, the wave vectors {right arrow over (K)}_(i,1) of the pulses exiting the compensating DOEs are all identical. The middles of these DOEs 211 are situated on one and the same plane situated at f₁ of the array 22 of lenses.

The Fourier lens 23 operates the Fourier transform from the plane A to the plane of the combining DOE 1; therefore the angles of incidences θ_(2k) of the pulses on the combining DOE are given by:

θ_(2k) =k·P _(A) /f ₂.

As indicated in the preamble, these angles θ_(2k) are also related to the period of the grating of the combining DOE 1 so as to obtain the desired optimal combining.

As shown in FIG. 5a , so that the spatial distributions of energy of the incident pulses on the combining DOE 1 are parallel to the plane of the combining DOE (the plane xOy in the figure), the angle of inclination (in the plane xOz) of the energy distribution of the pulses before the lens 23 must equal θ_(2k). For optimal overlap of the pulses at the level of the combining DOE 1, the imaging device consisting of the array of lenses 22 and of the Fourier lens 23, of magnification γ=−f₂/f₁, then imposes the following condition on the angle of inclination of the spatial distributions of energy φ_(1k) on exiting each compensating DOE 211:

tan(φ_(1k))=γ tan(θ_(2k))

Moreover, it is considered that each compensating DOE 211 comprises a grating of uniform spacing Λ_(k), and that its normal is inclined by an angle Θ_(k) with respect to the desired direction of propagation on exiting the DOE 211 (z axis in FIGS. 5a, 5b, 5c ). The angle between the direction of incidence of the source S_(k) and the desired direction of propagation on exit from the DOE is designated by θ_(1k). Finally φ_(1k) designates the angle on exit from the compensating DOE 211, between the spatial distribution of energy of the pulse and the axis of propagation of the pulse. The wave vectors on entry to and on exit from the compensating DOE 211 are not parallel (except for the compensating DOE which is not inclined, that is to say such that: Θ₀=0); the angles Θ_(k), θ_(1k) and φ_(1k) are linked by:

${\tan \left( \phi_{1k} \right)} = {\frac{\sin \; \left( {\theta_{1k} - \Theta_{1k}} \right)}{\cos \left( \Theta_{1k} \right)} + {\tan \; \left( \Theta_{1k} \right)}}$

Optimization of the spatial overlap of the pulses at the level of the combining DOE implies:

${\frac{\sin \left( {\theta_{1k} - \Theta_{k}} \right)}{\cos \left( \Theta_{k} \right)} + {\tan \; \left( \Theta_{k} \right)}} = {\gamma \; {\tan \left( {k\; \frac{P_{A}}{f_{2}}} \right)}}$

This giving a first relation between the parameters dimensioning the system:

the spatial period P_(A) of the source points in the plane A,

the index k of the source,

the central wavelength of the pulses λ₀,

the magnification γ of the imaging device,

the focal length f₂ of the Fourier lens 23.

Moreover, as illustrated in FIG. 5c , for each compensating DOE 211, the spacing Λ_(1k) of its grating is established as a function of the direction of incidence θ_(1k), of the direction of inclination of the grating, and of the wavelength λ₀ by:

$\Lambda_{1k} = \frac{\lambda_{0}}{{\sin \left( {\theta_{1k} - \Theta_{k}} \right)} + {\sin \left( \Theta_{k} \right)}}$

Finally, the optimization of the spatial overlap of the pulses at the level of the recombining DOE 1 is ensured by means of the system described in FIGS. 4 and 5 a if the following relations between the parameters of the system are satisfied:

$\left\{ {\begin{matrix} {{\frac{\sin \left( {\theta_{1\; k} - \Theta_{k}} \right)}{\cos \left( \Theta_{k} \right)} + {\tan \left( \Theta_{k} \right)}} = {\gamma \; {\tan \left( {k\frac{P_{A}}{f_{2}}} \right)}}} \\ {\Lambda_{1k} = \frac{\lambda_{0}}{{\sin \left( {\theta_{1k} - \Theta_{k}} \right)} + {\sin \left( \Theta_{k} \right)}}} \end{matrix}{i.e.\text{:}}\left\{ \begin{matrix} {{\frac{\sin \left( {\theta_{1\; k} - \Theta_{k}} \right)}{\cos \left( \Theta_{k} \right)} + {\tan \left( \Theta_{k} \right)}} = {\gamma \; {\tan \left( {k\frac{P_{A}}{f_{2}}} \right)}}} \\ {\Lambda_{1k} = \frac{\lambda_{0}}{\gamma \; {\tan \left( {k\frac{P_{A}}{f_{2}}} \right)}{\cos \left( \Theta_{k} \right)}}} \end{matrix} \right.} \right.$

Compensation of the chromatic dispersion is now considered.

To a first approximation, the combining DOE is considered to be the superposition of N sinusoidal gratings (N being the number of beams to be combined), of spacing Λ_(2k) given by:

$\Lambda_{2k} = \frac{\lambda_{0}}{\sin \left( \theta_{2k} \right)}$

The period of the grating of the combining DOE is therefore equal to:

λ₀/sin θ₂₁.

With θ_(2k) the angle of incidence of the beam of index k on the combining DOE 1, at the central wavelength λ₀. To deal with the compensation of the chromatic dispersion for the beam indexed k, only the grating indexed k is considered. A beam is considered at a wavelength λ₀+δλ₀ incident on the combining DOE 1 with an angle θ_(2k)+δθ_(2k). As illustrated in FIG. 6b , in order for the beams diffracted by the DOE 1 at λ₀ and at λ₀+δλ₀ to have parallel directions of propagation (or wave vectors), conservation of the component tangential to the plane of the DOE of the wave vector implies:

${\delta\theta}_{2k} = {\frac{\delta\lambda}{\lambda_{0}}{\tan \left( \theta_{2k} \right)}}$

The chromatic dispersion of the combining DOE 1 is therefore equal to:

$\frac{\partial\theta_{2k}}{\partial\lambda} = \frac{\tan \left( \theta_{2k} \right)}{\lambda_{0}}$

Likewise, for the compensating DOE 211, it was seen that the spacing of the compensation grating Λ_(1k) is established as a function of the direction of incidence θ_(1k), of the direction of inclination of the grating, and of the wavelength λ₀ by:

$\Lambda_{1k} = \frac{\lambda_{0}}{{\sin \left( {\theta_{1k} - \Theta_{k}} \right)} + {\sin \left( \Theta_{k} \right)}}$

Calculation of the angular disparity δθ_(1k) between the wave vectors diffracted by the compensating DOE 211 at the wavelengths λ₀ and at λ₀+δλ₀ and illustrated in FIG. 6a gives:

${\delta\theta}_{1k} = {\frac{\delta\lambda}{\lambda_{0}}\left( {{\tan \left( \Theta_{k} \right)} + \frac{\sin \left( \theta_{1k} \right)}{\cos \; \Theta_{k}}} \right)}$

The angular dispersion of the compensating DOE 211 is therefore equal to:

$\frac{\partial\theta_{1k}}{\partial\lambda} = {\frac{1}{\lambda_{0}}\left( {{\tan \left( \Theta_{k} \right)} + \frac{\sin \left( \theta_{1k} \right)}{\cos \; \Theta_{k}}} \right)}$

The chromatic compensation condition is deduced from the calculation of the angular magnification of the off-centered imaging device of transverse magnification γ such as that of the system described in FIG. 5a . The following condition is therefore obtained:

$\frac{\partial\theta_{2k}}{\partial\lambda} = {\frac{1}{\gamma \left( {1 + {\tan^{2}\left( \theta_{2k} \right)}} \right)}\frac{\partial\theta_{1k}}{\partial\lambda}}$

Finally, compensation of the chromatic dispersion of the combining DOE 1 is ensured by means of the device described in FIGS. 4 and 5 a if the following relations are satisfied:

$\Lambda_{1k} = \frac{\lambda_{0}}{{\sin \left( {\theta_{1k} - \Theta_{k}} \right)} + {\sin \left( \Theta_{k} \right)}}$ ${\gamma \; {\tan \left( {k\frac{P_{A}}{f_{2}}} \right)}\left( {1 + {\tan^{2}\left( {k\frac{P_{A}}{f_{2}}} \right)}} \right)} = {{\tan \left( \Theta_{k} \right)} + \frac{\sin \left( \theta_{1k} \right)}{\cos \left( \Theta_{k} \right)}}$

According to the conditions established in the previous sections, simultaneous compensation of the chromatic dispersion of the combining DOE 1 and of the defect of spatial overlap of the pulses at the level of the combining DOE 1 is ensured by means of the device described in FIGS. 4 and 5 a if the following relations are satisfied:

$\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix} {\Lambda_{1k} = \frac{\lambda_{0}}{{\sin \left( {\theta_{1k} - \Theta_{k}} \right)} + {\sin \left( \Theta_{k} \right)}}} \\ {{\gamma \; {\tan \left( {k\frac{P_{A}}{f_{2}}} \right)}\left( {1 + {\tan^{2}\left( {k\frac{P_{A}}{f_{2}}} \right)}} \right)} = {{\tan \left( \Theta_{k} \right)} + \frac{\sin \left( \theta_{1k} \right)}{\cos \left( \Theta_{k} \right)}}} \\ {{\frac{\sin \left( {\theta_{1k} - \Theta_{k}} \right)}{\cos \left( \Theta_{k} \right)} + {\tan \left( \Theta_{k} \right)}} = {{\gamma tan}\left( {k\frac{P_{A}}{f_{2}}} \right)}} \end{matrix} \right.$

Let us consider the example of the following case:

One wishes to combine 101 ultra-short (300 ps) pulse sources disposed in line according to a period P_(A) of 2 mm (NB: the following calculation is equivalent for a in 2-dimensional disposition with 101 sources on the largest diameter, i.e. 7651 sources in a hexagonal tiling).

The magnification of the imaging system is fixed at γ=−5.

The central wavelength equals λ₀=1030 nm.

FIG. 7 represents the values of angle of incidence θ_(1k)−Θ_(k) on the compensating DOEs and the angles of inclination Θ_(k) of the compensating DOEs 211, which satisfy the above system, and therefore ensure simultaneous compensation of the effects of chromatic dispersion of the combining DOE 1 and the defect of spatial overlap of the pulses on the combining DOE.

According to a particular embodiment of the invention an example of which is shown in FIGS. 8a and 8b , the compensating DOEs 211 are situated on one and the same plane, thereby simplifying the system and avoiding notably devices for orienting each DOE 211 which are bulky and increase the cost of the overall system. Such is the case when the gratings are for example fabricated on one and the same support, thus exhibiting advantages in terms of time and cost of fabrication. This is then manifested in the previous relations by zero angles of inclination Θ_(k) of the compensating DOEs: Θ_(k)=0.

Then for each compensating DOE 211, the angle of incidence θ_(1k) of the beam is such that:

γ·tan(k PA/f2)=sin(θ1k),

when one wishes to favor compensation of the defect of overlap of the recombined pulses to the detriment of chromatic compensation (FIG. 8a ), or

γ·tan(k PA/f2)(1+tan(k PA/f2)2)=sin(θ1k),

when one wishes to favor chromatic compensation of the recombined pulses to the detriment of compensation of the overlap defect (FIG. 8b ).

The gratings of the compensating DOEs are advantageously blazed phase gratings. Alternatively, they may be phase gratings with sinusoidal continuous profile, with binary profile, or intensity gratings with binary profile (black and white) or ne gray levels. All these examples, except blazed gratings, exhibit multiple diffraction orders and therefore penalize the overall efficiency of the system.

In the examples of the figures, the combining DOE 1 and compensating DOE 211 operate in transmission; the principle of the system according to the invention remains valid when using DOEs in reflection. 

1. A system for the spatial recombining of pulse laser beams of the same wavelength centered around λ₀, arising from N synchronized sources k, k varying from 1 to N, N being an integer >1, which has an optical axis and comprises: a Fourier lens of focal length f₂, of predefined object plane and predefined image plane, the laser beams exhibiting at λ₀ a periodic spatial configuration of spacing P_(A) in the object plane (plane A), a recombining diffractive optical element with periodic phase profile, on which the N beams are intended to be directed by the Fourier lens according to an angle of incidence θ_(2k) that differs from one beam to the next, these angles of incidence being determined as a function of the period of the recombining diffractive optical element, wherein the sources are able to emit pulses of duration less than 10⁻¹² s, and comprising: N compensating diffractive optical elements with periodic grating with one compensating diffractive optical element per source, an angle of incidence θ_(1k) that differs from one beam to the next, and a grating spacing Λ_(1k) that differs between neighboring compensating diffractive optical elements, an array of lenses with one lens per source, of predefined object plane and predefined image plane, forming with the Fourier lens a double-FT setup of predetermined magnification γ, able to image each compensating diffractive optical element on the recombining diffractive optical element, the compensating diffractive optical elements being situated in the object plane of the array of lenses, the recombining diffractive optical element being situated in the image plane of the Fourier lens, the image plane of the array of lenses coinciding with the object plane of the Fourier lens, and wherein for each compensating diffractive optical element, the angle of incidence θ_(1k) of the beam on the compensating diffractive optical element, the angle of inclination Θ_(k) of the compensating diffractive optical element on the optical axis, and the spacing Λ_(1k) of its grating, are determined on the basis of the spacing P_(A), of k, of λ₀, of the magnification γ, of the focal length f₂ and of the period of the combining diffractive optical element.
 2. The spatial recombining system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the angles of inclination Θ_(k) of the compensating diffractive optical elements are zero, and in that they are situated in one and the same plane.
 3. The spatial recombining system as claimed in claim 2, wherein for each compensating diffractive optical element, the angle of incidence θ_(1k) of the beam is such that: γ·tan(k P _(A) /f ₂)=sin(θ_(1k)).
 4. The spatial recombining system as claimed in claim 2, wherein for each compensating diffractive optical element, the angle of incidence θ_(1k) of the beam is such that: γ·tan(k P _(A) /f ₂)(1+tan(k P _(A) /f ₂)²)=sin(θ_(1k)).
 5. The spatial recombining system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the sources are disposed according to a one-dimensional or two-dimensional spatial configuration.
 6. The spatial recombining system as claimed in claim 5, wherein the beams arising from the laser sources having one and the same exit plane, it comprises another Fourier lens having an object plane in which the exit plane of the laser sources is situated.
 7. The spatial recombining system as claimed in claim 1, wherein N>100.
 8. The spatial recombining system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the gratings of the compensating diffractive optical elements are blazed gratings. 